Benevolent Lies

Philanthropy has a remarkable power to captivate. It’s a story we love to tell ourselves, a tale of benevolence, sacrifice, and goodwill. Wealthy individuals and corporations generously open their coffers, pouring resources into schools, hospitals, food programs, and social justice initiatives. The world claps. Headlines bloom with praise. Their legacies are polished to a gleaming shine.

But beneath the veneer of altruism lies a darker reality. Philanthropy isn’t just flawed, it’s often a grift, a mechanism for the wealthy and powerful to maintain control, enhance their influence, and perpetuate the very exploitation that fuels their wealth. It’s a sleight of hand, designed to make us believe that giving is a selfless act, when, in fact, it is an exchange, a carefully calculated transaction where the giver always wins.

The Philanthropic Performance

To understand how philanthropy functions as a grift, we must first examine its stagecraft. Charitable giving is never just about the act itself. It’s about perception—of the giver as generous, the recipients as grateful, and the public as inspired. But this narrative obscures the larger dynamics at play.

The grift of philanthropy begins with its framing. The giver is positioned as a saviour, swooping in to address problems that they are often directly responsible for creating. Consider the tech billionaire funding educational programs while lobbying against progressive tax reforms that could sustainably fund public education. Or the oil magnate establishing climate change foundations while extracting billions from fossil fuels. These acts of "charity" are not solutions—they are distractions, designed to protect wealth, and deflect criticism.

The rewards are immense. Tax breaks turn donations into financial advantages. Foundations shield wealth, allowing it to grow tax-free while doling out small percentages to high-profile causes. In the public eye, the donor gains an aura of untouchable virtue, often translating into greater political influence or market opportunities. And while the giver ascends, the structural issues remain untouched—or are even exacerbated.

A System Built on Dependency

One of philanthropy’s greatest lies is that it solves problems. In truth, it often entrenches them. Aid programs frequently address symptoms, not causes. They provide enough relief to pacify unrest but not enough to disrupt the systems that create inequality.

Take, for instance, international aid initiatives. Wealthy nations and corporations fund programs to "develop" impoverished regions while continuing to exploit their natural resources, suppress wages, and undermine local industries. Aid becomes a Band-Aid on the open wound of exploitation, ensuring that dependency on foreign assistance remains high while systemic inequities deepen.

At home, similar dynamics play out. Food banks flourish in a society where corporations lobby against living wages. Homeless shelters proliferate in cities where real estate developers—often donors themselves—drive up rents. These efforts are lauded as acts of compassion, yet they leave the root causes of poverty and inequality untouched, preserving a status quo that benefits the wealthy.

The Moral Shield

Philanthropy doesn’t just protect wealth, it shields it from accountability. By positioning themselves as benefactors, the wealthy inoculate themselves against criticism. How can one question a company that donates millions to cancer research or funds college scholarships?

This moral shield is particularly potent in times of crisis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, billionaires pledged massive donations to health initiatives, vaccine distribution, and economic recovery programs. Yet many of these same billionaires saw their wealth skyrocket during the crisis, often due to the very systems that exacerbated inequality. Their philanthropy became a PR strategy, a way to deflect scrutiny and reinforce their legitimacy as stewards of society.

Even more insidious is how philanthropy frames systemic issues as individual responsibilities. When corporations or the ultra-wealthy step in to fund public goods, the underlying message is clear: government can’t, or won’t, solve these problems. This narrative undermines collective action and erodes public trust in institutions, paving the way for privatized solutions that serve elite interests.

Breaking the Cycle

If philanthropy is a grift, what’s the alternative? How do we address the world’s problems without falling into the trap of dependence on the wealthy?

1. Redistribute Wealth Through Policy
   Real solutions lie in systemic change. Progressive taxation, robust social programs, and worker protections are far more effective at addressing inequality than any charitable initiative. Instead of relying on billionaires to fund education, we should demand a tax system that ensures schools are adequately funded for all.
2. Empower Communities, Not Donors
   Grassroots movements and community-led initiatives are the antithesis of top-down philanthropy. These efforts prioritize local knowledge and long-term impact over performative generosity. By funding and empowering these movements, we can build sustainable solutions from the ground up.
3. Expose the Illusion
   The narrative of philanthropy as pure benevolence must be dismantled. Media, activists, and scholars have a role to play in highlighting the contradictions and hypocrisies of the philanthropic-industrial complex. Transparency and accountability are critical.
4. Reimagine Giving
   True generosity isn’t about control or influence—it’s about relinquishing power. This means supporting initiatives without strings attached, funding solutions that challenge the status quo, and stepping back to let those most affected lead the way.

The Reckoning

The grift of philanthropy has persisted for centuries, adapting to new eras and disguising itself in ever-changing rhetoric. But its essence remains the same: it is a tool for the powerful to consolidate control, while masquerading as a force for good.

Benevolent lies can no longer suffice. If we are to build a fairer, more just world, we must look beyond the shiny facades of charity and confront the systems of exploitation they conceal. We must stop celebrating the crumbs that fall from the tables of the rich, and start demanding the equitable distribution of the meal.

Philanthropy isn’t the solution. It’s part of the problem. Let’s not just call it out—let’s dismantle it.

There is one simple question to pose to any philanthropist. What did the donation cost? The answer is, they made money on the transaction. Or they wouldn’t have done it.

Join the Conversation
What are your thoughts on the role of philanthropy in perpetuating inequality? Share your perspective, and subscribe for more deep dives into the systems shaping our world.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This is what I’m working on. Tell me what you think, I enjoy the conversation! Subscribe and follow the work in real time.

Thanks!

B

Benevolent lies keep power intact. Philanthropy isn’t about solving problems; it’s about protecting the systems that create them. Stop celebrating the crumbs. Start demanding the feast.

PS -