False Calm
Project 2025 in a Toque Is Not a Metaphor. It’s a Warning.
The enemy doesn’t kick down your door anymore. He signs your child’s report card. He shakes your hand at the debate. He talks about jobs while rewriting your Charter behind closed doors. Canada doesn’t face a political choice this month. It faces an existential test.
And we’re failing.
Schmutzie does the job of what media should have done months ago, walking the corridors of the 2023 CPC Policy Declaration and naming what’s hiding behind the drapes: imported extremism in a domesticated suit. This isn’t policy. This is proxy war — language drafted in Arlington, polished in Regina, and marketed for “reasonable Canadians” who think fascism can’t happen here because the snow is too deep.
Let me be crystal clear: it can. It is. And unless you move now, it will be too late.
Elan Morgan
SYSTEM INSIGHT: THE CPC DECLARATION IS INFRASTRUCTURE
What this document reveals — and what most will miss — is that the CPC’s policy declaration isn’t a list of beliefs. It’s a multi-domain deployment system. A structural offensive. Designed to tilt the field, not win the game.
Let’s name the four levers they’re pulling:
- Narrative Control (Section 18, 19, 110)
"Free speech" isn’t about liberty. It’s about legal immunity for hate. When they say “Chicago Principles,” they mean carte blanche for campus fascism. “Compelled speech” isn’t policy. It’s marketing for Petersonism. They’re codifying the right to dehumanise you — without consequence. - Structural Supremacy (Section 20, 102)
“Restore merit” is the dog whistle. It’s not about competence — it’s about exclusion. It’s policy as purity test. When women, LGBTQ+, or racialised people rise, they call it ideology. When white men run the boardroom again, they call it balance. - Healthcare as Ideological Battleground (Sections 78–89)
“Conscience rights” and “private options” sound like diversity of care. They’re not. They’re a scalpel to the spine of public health. When the private sector drains the public pool of doctors, it’s not competition — it’s collapse. - Legal Rewiring (Sections 125, 127, 167, 173)
From fetal personhood to firearms as heritage, from sex work criminalisation to the end of birthright citizenship — this isn’t conservatism. It’s constitutional subversion. Weaponised law as cultural war.
DEPLOYMENT PATH: HOW TO COUNTER A PLATFORM OF ERASURE
Do not debate this in abstractions. Do not argue “freedom” against “fairness.” That’s their game. Win with precision:
1. Reframe every policy as consequence.
Ask: What happens if this becomes law? What happens to your daughter? Your clinic? Your students? Your citizenship?
2. Collapse the platform into lived examples.
Turn CPC sections into single-sentence futures.
– Section 78: “Your emergency room wait just doubled.”
– Section 167: “Your neighbour’s Canadian-born child is now undocumented.”
– Section 102: “Your daughter’s sports team becomes a purity tribunal.”
3. Build the Matrix. Deploy the Conversation.
Create a two-column chart:
– Left side: CPC section.
– Right side: What it actually does.
Print it. Post it. Share it. Burn it into the timelines of people who still think this is just a “shift to the right.”
This election is not about Poilievre. It’s not even about the CPC.
It’s about you.
Your apathy is their asset. Your neutrality is their leverage. And your polite Canadian comfort is the final camouflage for an imported, precision-calibrated takeover of every progressive gain this country has made in 40 years.
If you still believe this is about taxes and crime, then read nothing further.
But if you see it — if you finally see it — then say it:
This is not my Canada. Not now. Not ever.