If It Was My Daughter

What a Father Sees in the System
There are things I wish I didnât understand.
I wish I didnât know what a âconsent videoâ is â how itâs used not as safety, but as theatre.
I wish I didnât understand how five men can coordinate assault and walk into court believing theyâve done nothing wrong.
I wish I didnât know how money erases accountability, how parents can hire lawyers to turn rape into âregret.â
But I do know.
Because we know what they did to her.
Would you hold the camera?
Iâm a dad.
I have daughters.
Too may times witnessing these kind of stories I have had to ask myself:
What if that was my girl?
To the mother of EM,
You do not need another apology. Another I'm so sorry.
You need a reckoning.
Because what your daughter endured wasnât just assault. It was systemic annihilation â wrapped in money, legacy, and law.
She wasnât just raped.
She was filmed, doubted, gaslit, cross-examined, and left to carry the weight of five men â and the nation that raised them.
And yet she stands.
Alone.
Clear.
Unshaken by the theatre they built around her.
This isnât written to soothe.
Itâs written to weaponise what you already know.
I cannot imagine the pain, anger, and fury you feel as a parent. I feel for you, and I support your decision to take on this fight, to stand with your child while you watch her live through an experience you can't make better, or take away. I read about that moment, when you found her crying in the shower... and I cried for her, and for you.
And for EM... you are brave, powerful, strong, and you have my deepest respect and care as a human, for what you suffered, survived, and chose to stand against.
What haunts me most is not what happened after.
Itâs what happened before.
They made a video.
Not for art. Not for memory.
But as a shield.
A filmed token. A digital alibi.
Because someone taught them that if a girl can slur the word âyesâ into a lens â it means you own her for the night.
And thatâs not immaturity. Thatâs cultural engineering.
Which means:
- This wasnât panic. It was process.
- This wasnât confusion. It was choreography.
- This wasnât misjudged sex. It was documented submission.
This is what those men know. It's what their friends, and teammates, and co-workers know. It's what they do, as casually as they might order food on their phone... just a step to getting what they want.
And now we know.
That âconsentâ isnât proof of safety.
In their world, itâs permission to violate.
âTHE GROSS ACTIONS ARE THE WAY THE DEFENCE HANDLED, PRESENTED, AND MANAGED THE PROCESSâŚâ
Those are my words.
I said it because I meant it.
It wasnât just what happened in that hotel room. It's what happened in the courtroom:
- Jurors dismissed because lawyers mocked them.
- Victim testimony cross-examined with a smirk.
- Institutional respect for legacy, not life.
This isnât legal defence.
Itâs cultural sadism â funded, practiced, perfected.
And itâs only possible because someone pays for it.
âEVERY ONE OF THOSE FIVE RAPISTS BELIEVED THAT THE âCONSENT VIDEOâ THEY MADE COMPLETELY ABSOLVED THEMâŚâ
Understand this:
They didnât panic after the rape.
They planned for it before.
They filmed her.
They staged it.
They passed that clip like a hall pass through a locker room of lawyers and enablers.
They were trained to believe that performance = permission.
That if she was drunk but on camera, it wasnât rape â it was just a good night out.
Thatâs not misunderstanding.
Thatâs industrialised predation.
And if youâre not sick yet, you should be.
Because I ask again:
How many of these âconsent videosâ exist right now â trophies of trauma, insurance against indictment?
And for every EM who stands up...?
There are thousands who canât.
Because the camera erased their right to be believed.
To every lawyer, sponsor, coach, agent, and silent parent:
If it was your daughter â would you still defend them?
If it was my daughter â would you hold the camera?
If you say yes, then letâs make a deal...
Think about that video.
Every second.
Alone.
With no court. No jury. Just your conscience.
And if you still think thatâs consent â
then may the world never forget your name.
âMAKE EVERY DOLLAR THAT FEEDS INTO THESE FIVE MEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY FUND RAPISTS.â
This is where most recoil.
This is where people start to get nervous.
But not me.
Because Iâve seen this too many times.
Reform doesnât work. Money does.
The only real lever is economic.
So we pull it:
- We trace every funder. Every lawyer. Every parent who moved money from a trust to a retainer to a courtroom.
- We identify every team, agent, and agentâs client still doing business with them.
- We issue the real invoice: âYou finance silence. You fund predators.â
This is not slander.
This is sovereignty.
And if they donât like it, they can try suing the truth.
TO THE PARENTS OF THOSE BOYS
You didnât fail because they hurt her.
You fail if you excuse it.
Do not call this confusion.
Do not call this alcohol.
Do not call this youth.
Because youth doesnât film itself destroying someone and call it insurance.
Thatâs not immaturity.
Thatâs predator logic â inherited and funded.
And if you wonât name that â
then you raised them for this.
âRAPE THEIR INCOME STREAMS LIKE THEY RAPED HER.â
No â we donât mirror their crime.
We donât desecrate what she endured by trying to âeven the score.â
But I understand the fury behind these words.
I felt it.
What I'm really saying is:
âI want to render their economy incapable of ever protecting rape again.â
That, I endorse.
We donât respond with violence.
We respond with architectural annihilation:
- Every firm loses clients.
- Every sponsor gets shamed into silence.
- Every platform that hosts their names gets flagged for what they really are: merchants of unaccountable legacy.
We do this not out of rage â but because no system deletes itself.
We have to replace it.
This isnât about verdicts.
This isnât about trials.
This is about the economy of insulation:
Law firms that mock victims then fund campaigns.
Parents who buy freedom with reputation.
Institutions who think âplausible deniabilityâ is a brand strategy.
No more.
From this moment forward, every dollar connected to those men becomes a declaration:
âWe chose them. We fund this.â
And we will make sure the world knows.
âTHE ONLY WAY TO AFFECT CHANGE IS TO TARGET THEIR REVENUE STREAMS.â
No protest. No petition.
Just exposure. Erasure. Consequence.
- Audit the law firms.
- Map the parental businesses.
- Strike the sponsors.
- Archive the enablers.
Then force every one of them to answer this:
âIf that was your daughter â would you hold the camera for the rape insurance?â
Because if the answer is no â then the verdict is in.
âAS HUMANS, WE CAN DO THIS BETTER.â
Thatâs the line that breaks me.
Because yes, we can.
But not with feelings.
With consequence.
Permanent. Public. Precise.
Because what EM endured â what her mother watched happen in that courtroom â can never be undone.
But what funded it?
We end that.
We bankrupt the ecosystem.
We tear out the legacy.
We build a world where insulation is impossible.
And we leave a message for every boy, agent, parent, and predator hiding behind wealth:
âYou are no longer protected.â
I canât say âIâm sorryâ for what happened to her.
Because that implies helplessness.
And I am not helpless.
None of us are.
We are fathers. Mothers. Citizens. Builders.
And we have a singular mission:
To make the economy of silence so expensive â no one will ever afford it again.
This isnât about guilt or verdicts.
This is about consequence that outlasts the courtroom.
Consequence that strips legacy from power.
Consequence that burns the insulation that rape culture built.
This isnât a letter.
Itâs a weapon.
Wield it. Deploy it.
And may it burn every lie they built.
Signed,
A father. A witness. A builder of consequence.
Consent videos are not rape insurance.
Hold the money accountable. It's the only way to account for change.
This is what Iâm working on. Tell me what you think, I enjoy the conversation! Subscribe and follow the work in real time.
Thanks!
B
If it was your daughter â would you still defend them?
5 men. A video. A courtroom that mocked her.
Not just a rape â a ritual. Funded. Filmed. Protected.
You want real change?
Then bankrupt the ecosystem that protected them.
This isnât cancel culture.
This is consequence.
PS -

WHAT COMES AFTER THE OUTRAGE
This isnât for the spectators. This is for the architects.
Youâve read the headlines. Youâve seen the trial. You know her name â or at least her letters.
Now you want to know what to do.
This is your instruction set. The internal playbook. The weaponised blueprint for economic, reputational, and institutional consequence.
1. THE ENABLER INDEX
A real-time, verified database of every:
- Law firm representing the accused
- Partner-level lawyers involved
- Sponsors and brand affiliations
- Business entities tied to parents and family trusts
- Media outlets running protection narratives
Every name, archived. Every dollar, traced. Every affiliation, mapped.
2. THE STRIKE GUIDE
Step-by-step tactical execution:
- How to audit a business for predator funding
- How to trigger sponsor exodus without defamation
- Scripts for contacting institutions with precision
- Asset exposure templates for ESG-focused investors
- The architecture of a silent pressure campaign
This isnât loud. Itâs lethal.
3. THE LEDGER: PROOF VAULT
Permanent storage of:
- Publicly sourced financial ties
- Media coverage archives (sanitised vs. verified)
- Survivor counter-narratives and testimony metadata
- Consent video case law and forensic breakdowns
This ensures they canât memory-hole the story.
History wonât be erased â it will be weaponised.
4. THE NARRATIVE CONTROL ROOM
Comms discipline is power. Hereâs what youâll access:
- Public statement templates for allies, partners, and brands
- Language calibration for media outreach
- FAQ weaponisation
- Proactive content strategy to control the narrative arc
The goal is not awareness. Itâs compression. Clarity. Closure through consequence.
5. THE RAPTOR TOOLKIT
For those building systems to detect, expose, and eliminate protective financial infrastructures in sports, education, and legacy industries:
- Scraper tools for director affiliations
- Investment flow mappers
- AI-powered brand risk monitors
- Consent video pattern recognition frameworks
This is system-level engineering â not reactionary outrage.
If you're inside this wall, you're not here to observe.
You're here to collapse the structure.
Subscribe, install, deploy.
Because if it was your daughter â and the system responded like this â
youâd want to know who funded it, too.