Rise of the Engineered State
The Techbro Delusion and the False Engineer
In the modern age, power does not reside with politicians, philosophers, or even economists—it belongs to engineers. Or, more precisely, to the idea of engineers. The Silicon Valley ethos has crowned the “engineer” as the ultimate problem solver, the bringer of disruptive innovation, and the wielder of technology to remake the world. From Tesla to Twitter, the “engineer” has become the symbol of a new ruling class, one that believes in efficiency, scale, and systemization above all else.
At its pinnacle sits Elon Musk, the self-anointed Engineer Prime, the living embodiment of this philosophy. But there’s a problem. The very foundation of this engineer-worship is flawed—not because engineers cannot shape the world, but because the version of “engineering” worshipped in Silicon Valley is not engineering at all.
The Engineered State is rising, driven by men who think they are engineers but fundamentally misunderstand what engineering is. And that misunderstanding is not just reshaping technology—it's reshaping governance, economics, and society itself.
What is an Engineer? (And What It's Not)
A real engineer understands constraint, failure, and responsibility. They balance mathematical precision with physical reality, creating solutions that are grounded in rigorous testing, structured problem-solving, and an understanding of systems that must function under real-world conditions.
The Silicon Valley Techbro Engineer, on the other hand, believes that engineering is simply hacking things together, moving fast, and breaking things. The idea is that problems are just lines of code waiting to be rewritten, that systems don’t have intrinsic stability requirements, and that physics and reality itself can be bent to will through sheer iteration.
Here lies the critical flaw: real engineering is about ensuring things don’t break. Techbro engineering is about breaking things to then find out what happens.
Consider the differences between real engineering and Techbro engineering:
| Real Engineering | Techbro Engineering |
|---|---|
| Rooted in physics, mathematics, and real-world constraints | Rooted in abstraction, code, and “scalability” |
| Failure is costly and must be minimized | Failure is a learning opportunity and should be maximized |
| Works within known constraints to create stability | Assumes constraints can be “disrupted” away |
| Safety and reliability come first | Speed and iteration come first |
The Techbro does not build bridges, power plants, or aircraft carriers. He builds software, which—if it fails—can simply be patched. But the world outside of code doesn't work this way.
Elon as Engineer Prime
Elon Musk is the perfect case study of the Techbro Engineer, the ideological apex of this flawed understanding of engineering. He is not an engineer in the traditional sense—he is an engineer by belief, rather than by training.
Consider how Musk presents himself:
- Tesla: Musk is credited as an “engineer,” yet Tesla’s core battery, powertrain, and vehicle safety designs came from teams of actual engineers who applied traditional physics and materials science.
- SpaceX: Musk boasts about his “hands-on” engineering, but the actual success of SpaceX is built on classically trained aerospace engineers following rigorous and structured engineering principles.
- Twitter/X: When Musk took over Twitter, he applied Techbro engineering: mass layoffs, destruction of critical trust and safety systems, and “rapid innovation” that broke basic functionality.
This Techbro approach to engineering sees the world as a hackathon, where disruption is always good, and failure is always a step forward. But engineering doesn’t work like that. When engineers build a bridge, they don’t get to “patch” it once it collapses. The fundamental misunderstanding at the heart of the engineered state is that everything can be treated as software.
The Engineered State: A Society Run by False Engineers
The worship of the Techbro Engineer is no longer limited to technology companies—it has expanded to governance, economics, and even public policy.
The belief is simple: the world is just a system, and systems can be optimized like code. From Musk’s Neuralink and Twitter rework to crypto-anarchists promising “smart contract societies”, the mindset is the same:
- Institutions are inefficient.
- We can rebuild them from scratch, faster and better.
- Failure is a feature, not a bug.
This thinking leads to dangerous conclusions. Take cryptocurrency governance as an example:
- Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) promised to “engineer” new forms of government. They failed spectacularly.
- Bitcoin maximalists argue that governments can be replaced by math, ignoring the reality that governance is not an optimization problem—it's a social contract.
We are watching the rise of the Engineered State, where actual governance, stability, and responsibility are dismissed as outdated bureaucracy. The new ideology is “move fast, break things, and govern by algorithm.”
And yet, reality keeps asserting itself:
- Musk’s Twitter takeover proved that gutting moderation systems leads to chaos.
- Crypto's collapse in 2022-23 showed that financial systems cannot be coded away.
- AI’s “hallucinations” and bias issues reveal that not all problems are engineering problems—some are human problems.
The Engineered State is emerging, but it is deeply fragile, because it does not respect real engineering principles. The real world has consequences, and Techbro engineering is built on the assumption that there are none.
The Coming Reckoning
The idea that the world can be “engineered” like software is seductive. It promises a frictionless utopia, where everything runs on logic, efficiency, and automation. But the world is not a codebase. The world is a complex, interdependent system of physics, biology, and human behaviour.
The Engineered State is already failing, because it's built on a false premise:
- Engineering is not about disruption. It's about stability.
- Engineering is not about iteration. It's about precision.
- Engineering is not about breaking things. It's about making things that do not break.
Musk, Silicon Valley, and the Techbro ideology will continue to push the fantasy of the engineer-king, the man who can remake reality through sheer force of innovation. But reality will win.
Because reality has constraints.
And real engineers know that constraints are not something to be ignored. They are something to be understood.
This is what I’m working on. Tell me what you think, I enjoy the conversation! Subscribe and follow the work in real time.
Thanks!
B
The Engineered State is rising, built by men who think they're engineers, but aren’t. Real engineering is about stability. Techbro engineering is about breaking. Elon is Engineer Prime. The reckoning is coming. Reality has constraints.
PS -