16 May 2025 6 min read

The New Compass

Direction Is No Longer North–South

Ottawa doesn’t look south to plan anymore.

We’re not anti-American. We’re post-American.

For over a century, Canadian strategy — economic, military, diplomatic, and cultural — defaulted to a single axis: north-south. If we built something, we built it for American buyers. If we raised money, it came from American firms. If we set policy, it was designed to stay compatible with U.S. infrastructure, politics, or defence.

That was the compass.

It made sense in a unipolar world. One centre of gravity, one dominant currency, one cultural megaphone.

That world is over.

We now live in a polycentric, multi-network, sovereign-first global system. The signals are clear:

The Indo-Pacific is the most consequential trade zone on Earth.
The EU is accelerating digital, regulatory, and capital standardisation.
Africa is industrialising faster than any region since post-war Asia.
LATAM is demanding equal-footing partnerships — not aid.
And global commerce is increasingly coordinated through decentralised protocols, not federal decrees.

But most Canadian operators are still mapping from a dead compass.

South Is No Longer Strategic. It’s Sentimental.

The U.S. is no longer a guaranteed buyer, stable regulator, or trusted partner. We need to say that plainly.

Their domestic dysfunction isn’t a phase. It’s structural.

Congress can’t legislate at scale.
Financial policy swings, almost daily.
Geopolitical trust is fractured — even among allies.
Consumer markets are saturated and shrinking by purchasing power.

When you build for the American market, you are building for a user base that is broke, polarised, and legally unpredictable.

Still hungry? Yes. Still powerful? Yes.

But not stable.

And stability is the bedrock of strategic leverage.

The Axis Has Shifted. Quietly. Permanently.

Canada’s external strategy is already reorienting.

Trade: Our largest new bilateral focus is the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), not NAFTA 5.9.7
Tech: Our most promising AI, cleantech, and biotech collaborations are emerging with South Korea, the Netherlands, and Singapore.
Culture: Our creators gain more traction from global platforms like Spotify, TikTok, or Patreon than from traditional American media placement.
Defence: NORAD still exists, but real security now includes data sovereignty, supply chain resilience, and food autonomy — none of which require American alignment.

Ottawa isn’t looking south. It’s building wide.

The compass is spinning — not out of control, but toward a new equilibrium.

You’re Still Pointing the Wrong Way

If you’re a founder, operator, strategist, or builder — look at your assumptions:

Who is your ideal customer?
Who is underwriting your capital?
Who controls your platform infrastructure?
Who do you pitch, quote, or cite to appear “credible”?

If the answer is still anchored to the U.S., your compass is wrong.

It’s not about rejection. It’s about relevance.

You are not betraying legacy by turning east or global — you are aligning with motion.

The New Direction Is Layered, Not Linear

There is no singular replacement empire.

There is no “next America.”

What exists now is directional plurality.

Asia-Pacific offers volume, speed, and experimentation.
The EU offers regulation, culture, and capital discipline.
Africa offers scale, resilience, and demographic growth.
Latin America offers resource alignment and underpriced access.
Decentralised networks offer governance, liquidity, and escape velocity.

Each of these is a new axis. A new way to orient how you deploy product, capital, content, or community.

And each of them offers you something America can’t: room.

The Trigger: Who Are You Building For?

This is the operative question.

Are you still designing products to impress investors in California — or solve problems in Jakarta?

Are you still writing copy in American brand cadence — or speaking in commercial dialects that global buyers understand?

Are you still hoping for a U.S. exit — or are you building systems that mint cash, influence, or infrastructure anywhere?

Ask this with rigour.

If your answer is still American — fine.

But make it a choice. Not a default.

Stop Calibrating to Yesterday’s Gravity

You don’t owe America your model.

You don’t owe it your pitch deck, your monetisation logic, or your identity.

The old compass pointed south because the entire global system depended on American enforcement, distribution, and demand.

It no longer does.

This isn’t theory. It’s logistics.

The ships are already rerouted. The data is already stored elsewhere. The capital is already diversifying. The audience is already listening — just not where you expected.

Build for Markets in Motion — Not in Memory

Every Canadian business must ask: are we facing forward, or backwards?

Because there’s a new compass in your hands.

And it doesn’t point south.

If you’re ready to align your model with new markets, new systems, and new sovereign leverage...

You’re not late.

You’re just misaligned.

This is what I’m working on. Tell me what you think, I enjoy the conversation! Subscribe and follow the work in real time.

Thanks!

The compass used to point south.
Now it points east, global, and sovereign.
If you're still building for America — you're building for a market that's not moving.

PS -